You are here

Unsolved

The problem hasn't been solved

Error installing MPI, static Rosetta3.5 ubuntu

Category: 
Compilation

Dear developers,
I'd tried to complile and install Roseta3.5 in my Ubuntu Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS x86_64. My MPI version is MPICH2 Version: 1.4.1p1 and is installed at:
/usr/lib/mpich2/lib/libfmpich.so
/usr/lib/mpich2/lib/libmpichf90.so
/usr/lib/mpich2/lib/libmpl.so
/usr/lib/mpich2/lib/libmpichcxx.so
/usr/lib/mpich2/lib/libmpich.so
/usr/lib/mpich2/lib/libopa.so
At first I tried to compile using this options:
sudo scons bin mode=release cxx=gcc cxx_version=4.6 extras=mpi,static -j4

Post Situation: 

Rescoring protein docking decoys to get Irms

Category: 
Docking

Hi,

I'd like to rescore protein docking decoys to calculate the Irms (interface rms) against the lowest energy decoy. If I rescore using the scoring application, I can get the overall rms but not the Irms. I've tried including flags like -evaluation:Irms but can't seem to get it to work. Also, although less important, is there away to apply the same scoring as the docking application does - without specifying any scoring patches or weights or anything the overall score is completely different to the docking output score.

Cheers.

Post Situation: 

Possible Shellshock Patch problem results in no output files being written

Category: 
Loop Modeling

Folks,
In September 2014 (before shellshock patch) a user ran a Loop modeling job on our system (rhel 6.3 IBM Platform HPC 4.1.1.1)
The Rosetta version is rosetta_2014.30.57114_bundle
The user is running minirosetta.mpi.

the command is:
mpiexec -launcher ssh -f /PATH/machines -n 50 -ppn 8 /PATH/rosetta_2014.30.57114_bundle/main/source/bin/minirosetta.mpi.linuxgccrelease @/PATH/DGCR8_NOE_10172014/2LZM_broker_cst.options -database /PATH/rosetta_2014.30.57114_bundle/main/database

the options file looks like this

Post Situation: 

problem with modelling of protein (140 and 150 residues respectively)

Category: 
Structure prediction

Hello everyone,
i'm having some problems with 2 proteins that have 140 and 150 residues respectively.
By now i have generated only 1000 models (i intend to create 10000 in total), but i'm not having clusters at all :/
I read somewhere that the abinitio method (related to modelling) works on protein with less that 100 residues. Is that correct?
What can i do to overcome this problem?

Post Situation: 

What are "-nstruct" and "cluster_histogram.txt" for "clustering.py"?

Category: 
Structure prediction

Hi friends,
After following

https://www.rosettacommons.org/docs/latest/cluster.html

Can I ask something about the usage and how to interpret the results?. It seems that there is not so much information on the website.

# The following is my options
-in:file:fullatom
-out:file:silent /path/to/cluster.out
-run:shuffle
-cluster:radius -1

1. How many decoys per input structure is recommended to specify "-nstruct"?

Post Situation: 

Syntax for the alignment file in "minirosetta comparative modeling"

Category: 
Structure prediction

Hi friends,
I am confused about the syntax for the alignment file for homology modeling.

https://www.rosettacommons.org/docs/latest/minirosetta-comparative-model...

Can I ask
1) If "-cm:aln_format grishin" is specified, in the ".aln" file:

Post Situation: 

ab initio modelling - what to do next?

Category: 
Structure prediction

Hi everyone,
Finally i was able to create 10000 models of my 90 residues protein.
By running cluster.linuxgccrelease i got (i guess) 560 clusters:
---
Timing:
Readin:25s
Cluster: 22s
Additional Clustering: 513s
Total: 560
---
But now i don't know what to do.
According to the IsThisModelGood.pdf document, now i have to create a plot RMSD vs score, so as i don't have a crystal structure to use as a reference, i think the best idea will be to use the structure with the lowest energy, right?

Post Situation: 

Knowledge check on steric effects

Category: 
Structure prediction

Hi,

I am doing packing on PDB ID 1UKU and looking at two solutions my code produces, one having much higher energy than the other. The only difference between them is that the conformation of one of the Tryptophan residues is different, the other 100 or so residues are unchanged.

Post Situation: 

Questions on energy oddities

Category: 
Structure prediction

Hi,

I am doing side-chain packing on a fixed backbone over a discrete set of configurations. Given a set of (non-rotamer) side-chain configurations I'm using Rosetta to calculate one-body and two-body energies using the standard scoring function. I observe to things that seem strange in the two-body energies:

1) For a pair of residues sometimes the two-body energies are almost all zero except for a couple configurations. This sort of makes sense if the residues are far enough apart, but does it make sense that they are *exactly* zero?

Post Situation: 

Pages