You are here
Unsolved
The problem hasn't been solved
Duplicated Magic Number
Hello,
I modified an existing mover. Compilation finishes without any problems. When starting Rosetta I get the following error:
../rosetta_source/bin/minirosetta.macosgccrelease @flags Duplicate magic number in random object initialization! Number:84195 ERROR:: Exit from: src/numeric/random/random.cc line: 136
It seems basically all movers initialize their own RandomnumberGenerator with different seeds. So why is Rosetta complaining in this particular case and not with the other movers? What have I missed?
Error while running "make_fragments.pl".....[blastpgp] ERROR: Arguments must start with '-'
hello
I am encountering errors while trying to make fragments locally by using the script "make_fragments.pl". The command which I am using is
perl make_fragments.pl -verbose -nosam -noporter 1elwA.fasta
but it gives error
VERBOSE.
don't run porter.
don't run sam.
FILENAME: 1elwA.fasta
no id specified. parse filename instead.
INTERMEDIATE: 1elwA.fasta
ID: 1elw CHAIN: A
Sequence: EQVNELKEKGNKALSVGNIDDALQCYSEAIKLDPHNHVLYSNRSAAYAKKGDYQKAYEDGCKTVDLKPDWGKGYSRKAAALEFLNRFEEAKRTYEEGLKHEANNPQLKEGLQNMEAR
pdb files in Rosetta format
Hi,
I want to use rosetta to refine my NMR structure. Could someone tell me what is the rosetta format in pdb files, and how to add missing N- and C-term residues to my generated structure? Thank you very much.
Best regards,
ddg_monomer.mpi
ddg_monomer doesn't seem to work well with mpi. I would like it to send it a job with a large amount of mutation combinations and use the mpi enabled version to finish the job quickly.
Consider the following protocol:
mpirun -np 4 /rosetta3.3/rosetta_source/bin/ddg_monomer.mpi.linuxgccrelease @ddg.flag -in:file:s min_cst_0.5.input.pdb -constraints::cst_file ca.ca.dist.cst -ddg::mut_file example.mut -ddg::iterations 50
#example.mut is a simple mutation, for instance a Leu to Ala mutation on res 1
total 1
1
L 1 A
Ligand Docking Positive Control: wt ligand
Hi Everyone!
I'm Ben, I'm new here. I'm working on re-designing the binding pocket of an amino-acid binding protein for it to bind a new ligand. For this, I use enzdes. I want to compare the designs Rosetta makes with the wt protein in terms of binding energy (i.e. ligand-protein surface interaction energy) as a control. My question is: Is ligand docking the right application for this?
My plan in detail:
∆G calculation script for protein and mutation of AA at each residue
Hello all,
I am working on a script that takes a given cleaned (using the cleaning.py script) pdb file (attached as dG_calc.txt) that mutates each residue through the sequence of amino acids and calculates the dG and ddG. This is based on the ala_scan.py script except no docking or other things.
I had a couple of questions:
1) Does the mutate_residue in PyRosetta 2.0 repack the side chains automatically? If so to what distance?
2) If not, does PackRotamersMover take care of this? If I need to use this I should restrict the packer so it only uses the original amino acids?
behind threading protocol
Hi Rosetta's List,
Has anybody happen to know how the minirosetta threading protocols works?
AbinitioRelax using multiple cores on a single machine without mpi?
How would I use multiple cores on a single machine in an effective way without mpi?
How to relax a protein model calling Rosetta functions from my C++ code
My code creates protein models that need to be relaxed in order to lower their energy as these models may have some close contacts and other non-protein like features. According to the online documentation, the Rosetta command for relaxing non-idealized structures is
rosetta.exe aa xxx_ -relax -farlx -minimize -s xxx.start -fa_input -fa_output -use_input_bond
My questions are: 1) Is this the correct command for relaxing my models and make them "fall" in the nearest local minimum? 2) If so, how can I call these functions from inside my C++ code?