Question on restraining receptor symmetry when docking ligand
Hi there,
Is there a way to maintain receptor symmetry when performing flexible ligand docking protocol?
Thanks,
Subha
The problem hasn't been solved
Hi there,
Is there a way to maintain receptor symmetry when performing flexible ligand docking protocol?
Thanks,
Subha
Hello Everyone
I am trying to generate fragments for a short peptide (12 residues) to use them further in Flexpepdock. Following are the flag and weight files
Flag file
-in::file::vall /disk/software_sources/rosetta_bin_linux_2018.09.60072_bundle/tools/fragment_tools/vall.apr24.2008.extended.blast.gz
-in::file::fasta seq.fasta
-frags::ss_pred seq.psipred.ss2 predA
-frags::scoring:config weights.wghts
-frags::frag_sizes 3 5 9
Hi all
I try to run the script extend_terminus.py with the following command :
python extend_terminus.2.py -c A -o 1.c.pdb -a 1.clean.pdb AAGAAGAGAG
and i end up with the following error
pack_rotamers = rosetta.protocols.simple_moves.PackRotamersMover(sfxn, task)
AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'PackRotamersMover'
Does anyone know how to fix that ?
Cheers
JM
Hi, when is the next full (not daily or weekly) release anticipated, roughly?
Hi:
for example I got antibody- antigen interface score -10.650, how about -6.345
Is it indicate good binding?
Is the interface score related to Kcal/mol ?
Thanks a lot
Heyo,
I've got 10,000 output structures from the rosetta CM protocol and am looking to cluster the results to analyze these structures. I've been having issues running calibur (seperate post) and noticed that there was an energy_based_clustering program published recently.
In my quick browse of each I see that the way in which clusters are found is different for each. I am wondering if there is a significant difference in applicability of each, and if so, which one would be more applicable for homology modelling.
Thanks
Hi,
I generated 10,000 structures using the rosetta CM method. I then tried to cluster them using calibur in Rosetta 3.9, build# 60072 using the command "calibur.mpi.linuxgccrelease -pdb_list pdblist.txt" but it won't display the members of each cluster. It only shows the following at the end:
Largest 2 cluster centers: S_0445_4.pdb(35), S_0001_2.pdb(28). Margin = 20.00000%
cluster = 0; center = S_0445_4.pdb; n_decoy_members = 35; members =
Hello
I used backrub server for flexible modeling and the results of my run sent to my email address. but unfortunately I can not download my results and I got an error. I tried to download my results in several days but I got an error again. what is the problem and how can I solve it? thanks
Hi,
I have a protein-peptide(15 a.a) system with alreaddy a good guess for the binding mode of the peptide. Now I want to move slightly the peptide to a more reactive conformation and design mutants in this reactive conformation.
The “enzdes” application with a constraint file would do exactly what I need but I think it was created for “protein-small ligand” systems and I cannot use it with a multiple residues ligand like my peptide.
Hi:
I am trying to install Pyrosetta4 with the following system and software settings:
Ubuntu Linux 16.04 LTS 64Bit
Python 2.7.12 (ubuntu default), 64bit
PyRosetta4.Release.python27.ubuntu.release-184