You are here

Unsolved

The problem hasn't been solved

"in_progress" decoy files in some docking2 local_docking job tar archives

Category: 
Docking

In one of my ROSIE docking2 local_docking jobs (17702), I noticed that its tar archive's output\trigger-00001.dock folder contained several files like proteins_0130.in_progress.bz2 with the unusual size of 42 bytes in addition to many files like proteins_0129.pdb.bz2 and proteins_0131.pdb.bz2 with the more typical size of 82-84 kbytes. Do you know what causes these "in_progress" files to occur and how I can prevent them from occurring? Is the cure as simple as re-opening the job's web page and then reloading its tar archive file?

Thanks!

Post Situation: 

Fnat=NaN in a docking2 job

Category: 
Docking

One of my docking2 docking_local_refine jobs (#17790) output many structures with Fnat=NaN. I am used to seeing Fnat near 1 when the rms value is low and Fnat near 0 when the rms value is high. What would make Fnat give a value of NaN? Should I trust the other scores given for this run? How can I prevent future runs from giving Fnat=NaN?

Thanks!

Post Situation: 

Running time of Rosetta/FlexPepDock

Category: 
Docking

Hello everyone, and thanks for reading this!

My question is about the running time of a docking. I need to dock several same length peptides to a small protein. I have a around 55 nodes for this job. My question is should i put 1 job for each node, or should i do the jobs one by one and assig each job to the 55 cores with MPI?

Thanks!

Post Situation: 

How to determine interface residues

Category: 
Scoring
PyRosetta

Hi,

I have a couple questions about fold-trees and how interfaces are calculated in pyrosetta (or rosetta).  I have a structure of an antibody-antigen that I have prepared using rosetta (attached).  A visual inspection shows that residue B:TYR210 is making a number of close contacts with residues in Chain C (the antigen).  However, when I construct an Interface object in pyrosetta, this residue is not identified as being in the interface (using a cutoff of 5.0A):

 

from rosetta import *

Post Situation: 

The following options have been set but have not yet been used

Category: 
Structure prediction

Hi guys...

I'm using the Basic Homology Modeling, and received this massage on the final of the execution.

protocols.jd2.JobDistributor: WARNING: The following options have been set, but have not yet been used:
        -in:file:frag3 3rvyCH1_03_05.200_v1_3
        -in:file:frag9 3rvyCH1_09_05.200_v1_3
        -in:file:psipred_ss2 3rvyCH1.ss2
        -loops:frag_files  3rvyCH1_09_05.200_v1_3 3rvyCH1_03_05.200_v1_3 none
        -out:output 
        -out:pdb 

Here is my script

Post Situation: 

pose.replace_residue() & incorrect scoring

Category: 
Design
Scoring

Hi developers,

I wasn't sure where to submit bug reports so I'm posting here instead.

I've noticed a scoring error after repeated pose.replace_residue() function calls. The final pose after repeated calls to replace_residue() ends up having a score substantially lower (often < -50 Rosetta energy units) than when scored using the scoring application or if the pose is loaded upon application initialization.

Post Situation: 

Rosetta Holes

Category: 
Scoring

Dear Rosetta Users:

I would like to use the rosetta holes application to evaluate the packing of my protein. But the documentation for this aplication is not in great details. I have been searching posted questions about rosetta holes from the forum and it seems that this app has been in and out of the rosetta suite. So I am wondering if the rosetta holes is currently available in the most updated rosetta version and if there is a general guide on how to use this application.

Thank you very much!

Best regards,

zsun12

Post Situation: 

Pages