You are here
Unsolved
The problem hasn't been solved
"in_progress" decoy files in some docking2 local_docking job tar archives
In one of my ROSIE docking2 local_docking jobs (17702), I noticed that its tar archive's output\trigger-00001.dock folder contained several files like proteins_0130.in_progress.bz2 with the unusual size of 42 bytes in addition to many files like proteins_0129.pdb.bz2 and proteins_0131.pdb.bz2 with the more typical size of 82-84 kbytes. Do you know what causes these "in_progress" files to occur and how I can prevent them from occurring? Is the cure as simple as re-opening the job's web page and then reloading its tar archive file?
Thanks!
RMSD values for symmetric_docking clockwise vs counterclockwise cyclical outputs
Fnat=NaN in a docking2 job
One of my docking2 docking_local_refine jobs (#17790) output many structures with Fnat=NaN. I am used to seeing Fnat near 1 when the rms value is low and Fnat near 0 when the rms value is high. What would make Fnat give a value of NaN? Should I trust the other scores given for this run? How can I prevent future runs from giving Fnat=NaN?
Thanks!
Running time of Rosetta/FlexPepDock
Hello everyone, and thanks for reading this!
My question is about the running time of a docking. I need to dock several same length peptides to a small protein. I have a around 55 nodes for this job. My question is should i put 1 job for each node, or should i do the jobs one by one and assig each job to the 55 cores with MPI?
Thanks!
How to determine interface residues
Hi,
I have a couple questions about fold-trees and how interfaces are calculated in pyrosetta (or rosetta). I have a structure of an antibody-antigen that I have prepared using rosetta (attached). A visual inspection shows that residue B:TYR210 is making a number of close contacts with residues in Chain C (the antigen). However, when I construct an Interface object in pyrosetta, this residue is not identified as being in the interface (using a cutoff of 5.0A):
from rosetta import *
The following options have been set but have not yet been used
Hi guys...
I'm using the Basic Homology Modeling, and received this massage on the final of the execution.
protocols.jd2.JobDistributor: WARNING: The following options have been set, but have not yet been used:
-in:file:frag3 3rvyCH1_03_05.200_v1_3
-in:file:frag9 3rvyCH1_09_05.200_v1_3
-in:file:psipred_ss2 3rvyCH1.ss2
-loops:frag_files 3rvyCH1_09_05.200_v1_3 3rvyCH1_03_05.200_v1_3 none
-out:output
-out:pdb
Here is my script
pose.replace_residue() & incorrect scoring
Hi developers,
I wasn't sure where to submit bug reports so I'm posting here instead.
I've noticed a scoring error after repeated pose.replace_residue() function calls. The final pose after repeated calls to replace_residue() ends up having a score substantially lower (often < -50 Rosetta energy units) than when scored using the scoring application or if the pose is loaded upon application initialization.
ddg_monomer "ERROR: seqpos >= 1"
I am running the ddg_monomer with the high-resolution protocol. I am getting this error:
ERROR: seqpos >= 1
What does this usually mean?
Rosetta Holes
Dear Rosetta Users:
I would like to use the rosetta holes application to evaluate the packing of my protein. But the documentation for this aplication is not in great details. I have been searching posted questions about rosetta holes from the forum and it seems that this app has been in and out of the rosetta suite. So I am wondering if the rosetta holes is currently available in the most updated rosetta version and if there is a general guide on how to use this application.
Thank you very much!
Best regards,
zsun12