You are here

Unsolved

The problem hasn't been solved

Running RosettaHoles2

Can anyone provide straightforward instructions on how to get RosettaHoles2 to run?

From digging around the forums here it seems that it was included in 3.2 but undocumented, dropped in 3.3, planned to be included in 3.4, but wasn't. From what I can tell some functionality is available in RosettaScripts, but it's undocumented and unclear if it's Holes or Holes2. Some unreleased files were emailed to one user who may have gotten it to work in 3.4. Instructions on how to use it with 3.2 may have been emailed by the author to one user.

Post Situation: 

What's a good application to thread a sequence over a peptide (of a peptide-protein complex) and minimize?

Hi all,

I have a scenario where I have a peptide-protein complex. I would like to thread a series of sequences over the peptide, then minimize the peptide-protein complex. The idea being, I would like to tell which threaded-peptide-sequences would be the "best" binder predictors. Or at least be able to segregate between potential non-binding sequences and binding sequences.

I've been looking at the backrub protocol. Would this be an appropriate application? I don't see immediately how I can thread the sequences over the peptide with this application then.

Post Situation: 

ligand conformer generation for enzyme design

Hi everyone,
I'm trying to generate ligand conformers for redesigning an enzyme. I had an input conformation, but when using it to generate conformers, it gave me this error:

Loading internal fraglib
81736 fragments loaded in 0.65 seconds

Title = untitled
Can't assign MMFF type to atom number 44 S
Warning: force field setup failed due to missing parameters for molecule untitled

Can you give me some hints on solving this problem?
Thanks.

Post Situation: 

Different Pose Energy Values before and after Dumping

Im developing a Pyrosetta MC de-novo protein fold prediction method and at the end of the script I 'd want to print the energy values and RMSD from the native structure of my simulations and dump their poses as pdb files. so after doing that i noticed that if I import (pose_from_pdb) these poses and rescore them (using the same energy function I used in the script to score their energies) I get different energy values. Here i list the final part of my script which scores and dumps the poses: print_counter=0 f=open("output.dat","w")
Post Situation: 

-loops:refine_repack_cycles option not accepted by loopmodel.linuxgccrelease

As per the guide on Kinematic Loop Modeling http://www.rosettacommons.org/manuals/archive/rosetta3.4_user_guide/df/d..., I am trying to pass -loops:refine_repack_cycles as an option to loopmodel.linuxgccrelease.

However, I get the following error message: ERROR: Option matching -loops:refine_repack_cycles not found in command line top-level context

Post Situation: 

comparative modelling and broker

Hi,

I am trying to perform an abinitio modelling of the full-length structure of a two domains protein, having the crystal structure of the Nterminal one. If I try to use a similar protocol as the demo of comparative modelling with end extension the program stops with the following error:

ERROR: moving_connection.icoor().is_internal() && fixed_connection.icoor().is_internal()
ERROR:: Exit from: src/core/conformation/util.cc line: 100

sometimes the first pdb that comes out is ok, but when it crashes, the position of both domains is strangely far away.

Post Situation: 

flexible backbone design (fixbb+relax)

Dear all,

I want to use a two-step design procedure in which a fixed backbone design is combined with a backbone relaxation.
The two steps are supposed to be repeated alternately as long as they bring improvement in the energy.
(something like this http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22632833)

Which fixbb design parameters are the most important? I use -packing:ex1, -packing:ex2. But perhaps there is something else I should consider?

Post Situation: 

symmetric fixbb design with design_hpatch

Dear Rosetta users,

I tried to use hpatch score in symmetric design (-score:weights design_hpatch), but I got this error (rosetta 3.3 and 3.4):

sin_cos_range ERROR: -nan is outside of [-1,+1] sin and cos value legal range

Default and soft_rep_design scores work fine. Also turning off the symmetry (designing just one monomer) makes the error disappear.

Is design_hpatch compatible with symmetric design?

Best wishes,
Staszek

Post Situation: 

nr.fasta

Hi all,
I downloaded the nr database and I used the formatdb to format the database. Now I have the nr files which have been generated but I have obtained neither the nr.fasta necessary to create the filtnr by using "pfilt", nor the nrfilt files.How can I get them?

Thank you,

Silvia

Post Situation: 

Pages