You are here

Unsolved

The problem hasn't been solved

Build Error, ubuntu 10.10, scons 2.0, python 2.6.6 and gcc 4.4.5, truncation

Hello,
I'm using ubuntu 10.10, scons 2.0, python 2.6.6 and gcc 4.4.5
I built a release version of Rosetta, here are the last few lines of the building process
sh: o: not found
Install file: "build/src/release/linux/2.6/32/x86/gcc/rna_extract.linuxgccrelease" as "bin/rna_extract.linuxgccrelease"

Post Situation: 

(drluca77) python/gcc combo for mac build, pyrosetta 2.0

(This comment copied from a different topic)

Hello.

I downloaded and tried to use the Mac version, but I get this error:

Python 2.6.5 (r265:79063, Mar 20 2010, 11:39:18)
[GCC 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5646) (dot 1)] on darwin
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> from rosetta import *
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
File "rosetta/__init__.py", line 11, in
import utility
File "rosetta/utility/__init__.py", line 1, in
from __utility_all_at_once_ import *

Post Situation: 

3.2 with Intel Compilers on OS X Intel

Is building Rosetta 3.2 with the Intel compilers on OS X Intel supported? I ran the build like so:

./scons.py bin mode=release cxx=icc

And the resulting commands look like this:

g++ -o build/src/release/macos/10.5/64/x86/icc/super_aln.macosiccrelease build/src/release/macos/10.5/64/x86/icc/apps/public/comparative_modeling/super_aln.o -Llib -Lexternal/lib -Lbuild/src/release/macos/10.5/64/x86/icc -Lsrc -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/lib -ldevel -lprotocols -lcore -lnumeric -lutility -lObjexxFCL -lz

Post Situation: 

3.2 and Intel Compilers 12.0

It looks like there is some buggy interaction between Rosetta, Scons and the latest version of the Intel compilers.

I edited tools/build/options.settings to enable the 12.0 compiler version and tools/build/user.settings to find the Intel compilers and the error looks like this:


$ ./scons.py bin mode=release cxx=icc extras=static tatic
scons: Reading SConscript files ...
svn: '.' is not a working copy
scons: done reading SConscript files.
scons: Building targets ...

Post Situation: 

Rosetta parallel installation

Hi all,
have been using Rosetta for a while, but could not figure out exactly how to install parallel. I am very happy to see Rosetta3.2 latest version. I will be grateful to you if anyone suggest me how to install (best way)parallel and how to run applications in parallel.

Thank you in advance

Best regards,
vamsi

Post Situation: 

Rosetta 3.2

I used pc with Fedora 14. I used gcc 4.5 and mpich2 to compile Rosetta 3.2. However I encounter this erros when I try to compile Rosetta 3,2 with scons.

src/core/conformation/symmetry/util.cc: In function 'void core::conformation::symmetry::make_symmetric_pose(core::pose::Pose&, core::conformation::symmetry::SymmetryInfo)':
src/core/conformation/symmetry/util.cc:360:37: error: expected type-specifier
src/core/conformation/symmetry/util.cc:360:37: error: conversion from 'int*' to non-scalar type 'core::pose::PDBInfoOP' requested

Post Situation: 

unable to propagate location of libraries to scons for Rosetta 3.1 [FIXED...SORT OF...]

I am unable to propagate our cluster environment to the Rosetta scons scripts (most likely the library environment)

Here is my situation:

On our cluster, compilers are loaded using "module" (e.g. "module load compilers/gcc/4.4.2" or "module load mpi/openmpi/1.4.3_gcc").
-> Consequently, compilers (gcc, g++, ...) are not in "normal" PATH, and the same goes for some required libraries (and for INCLUDE paths also)

Post Situation: 

Docking an iron atom to a peptide

Hi All,

This is my first post to the form. I'm a new user to Rosetta.

I am using the ligand_docking application to dock an Fe(III) atom to a protein structure, and am running into difficulty. A few questions:

1. Is ligand_docking appropriate for docking a single atom to a protein molecule?

2. If ligand_docking is appropriate, what is the best way to do it? When I try to use the 1_setup.sh script produced by arls.py to set up a ligand docking run, it complains that I need to have at least 3 atoms in the Mol2 file used to define the ligand (the Fe atom).

Post Situation: 

Relax protocoll short pdb of AAA petide

I have used Modeller to to produce linear peptide. When I refine the linear peptide using relax protocol an peptide with for instance AAA is shorted to AA. How do I prevent this from happening. I am using relax.linuxgccrelease -database /home/knut/rosetta/rosetta_database -in:file:native $f -out:prefix relaxed_ -out:nstruct 1 this command with these options.

Knut J

Post Situation: 

is the RosettaNMR protocol available in Rosetta 3.x?

Hi all users of Rosetta,
I am a yung PhD student and is first time approach to Rosetta. I need to use RosettaNMR for my research program to include NOE RDC PCS in Rosetta calculation. But I noted that RosettaNMR is available only on Rosetta 2.x. Hence I ask you if in Rosetta 3.x is also possible include RDC data, because I found only c++ class to manage NOE and dihedral data.

Thanks.

Best regard.

Post Situation: 

Pages